Fournier - Baraja Nacional (1936 Copy + Comparison)
INTRODUCTION & IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
We have previously examined Heraclio Fournier's No. 25 – Baraja Nacional, featuring original artwork by Luis Alemany. That earlier article, based on a 1970 example, provides a closer look at the pack's creation, the artist behind it and its distinctive iconography.
Here, we turn to an example from an earlier print run, comparing the two editions to trace how the design has evolved over time.
The pack comprises 40 cards and bears the name Hijos de Heraclio Fournier. The 2 of Coins is inscribed AÑO DE 1936, while the 5 of Swords bears a tax stamp introduced in 1939. Several explanations might account for this chronological discrepancy, including the use of old stock or the retention of the 1936 inscription in later print runs. As its exact date of manufacture remains uncertain, we will use 1936 as the reference year throughout this article, for the sake of simplicity.
Curiously, none of the cards bears the designation Nacional, by which this model is known, or a reference number. I have been unable to determine whether the pack originally included a paper wrapper or a title card bearing this information.
ICONOGRAPHY & DESIGN
As discussed in the previous entry, the pack's artwork remained largely unchanged throughout its roughly forty-year production run. The differences lie primarily in the use of color, shading and color transitions, along with a number of inscriptions.
We will now examine these variations in greater detail through a direct comparison of the two packs.
PRINTING & FINISHING
More pronounced differences emerge between the two editions when examining their printing techniques. The 1936 version was produced using chromolithography, characterised here by somewhat irregular, organic-looking stippling in the shaded areas and color transitions. Each color is rendered in a separate ink, although additional hues can also be achieved through overprinting, a technique that does not appear to have been used in our example.
The 1970 edition, by contrast, was produced using offset printing, a more modern industrial process executed here to a very high standard. Compared with the earlier chromolithographic version, it exhibits more precise color registration, excellent contrast and remarkably crisp lines, along with a wider tonal range achieved through halftone screening, whose characteristic "rosettes" become visible under magnification. These differences are particularly evident where multiple colours converge, in color transitions and shaded areas.
A final observation concerns material and finish. Both editions use flexible cardstock with a satin finish that is almost matt. The 1970 version has a slightly more pronounced sheen, while the 1936 specimen feels subtly rougher to the touch, yet the two remain remarkably similar. Indeed, I doubt they could be distinguished by these traits alone; perhaps a reflection of the consistency of Fournier's quality standards over the years.
FINAL THOUGHTS
The comparison of the two editions reveals the remarkable continuity of Luis Alemany's artwork throughout the pack's production history. Despite some changes in iconography and color, the identity of the model remains virtually intact.
The most significant differences lie in the printing techniques, reflecting the technological evolution of the playing-card industry during this period. Yet it is striking how similar the quality of the cardstock and finishes remained despite these changes; a reflection, perhaps, of the care Fournier devoted, and continues to devote, to these aspects of its production.
Coins
Cups
Swords
Batons
Card Back
Comments
Post a Comment