Cartamundi - As de Oros (Review and Comparison)

Today we have a double feature: review and comparison. At first glance, this deck might seem to offer little new ground, given that its artwork was analyzed in a previous entry. However, as Antoine de Saint-Exupéry famously wrote, "what is essential is invisible to the eye." Or rather, invisible without a magnifying glass.

The illustrations are identical to those in the Faisán deck, and while not strictly necessary, I recommend reading that post before continuing. Nevertheless, here's a brief recap: this pattern is ubiquitous in the Mexican market, inspired by early 20th-century Clemente Jacques' designs which were, in turn, based on Fournier’s, making it a regional variant of the Castilian pattern. Furthermore, many local manufacturers have produced decks featuring them over the years.

 

⬥  ⬥  ⬥

 

This is Cartamundi’s version. While the Faisán deck stood out for its plastic made cards, here—returning to traditional cardstock—we must tip our hats to the graphic execution of our favorite playing card monopoly.

By paying a little attention, the superior print quality is immediately apparent, showing richer detail and more saturated, consistent colors. But under magnification, what was merely inferred with the naked eye becomes crystal clear. Cartamundi’s line work is uniform and razor-sharp, holding its definition no matter how much zoom is applied. The colored areas feature a perfectly crisp halftone grid, forming neat, orderly patterns that translate into vibrant tones and excellent contrast, making every detail pop. On the other hand, the Faisán offering is almost a polar opposite. Outlines that look adequate to the naked eye become blurry and poorly defined, with highly inconsistent line weights. The colors dissolve into an irregular cloud of random splotches, looking like they were made with a cheap consumer-level printer.

Left: Cartamundi - Right: Faisán
  
Left: Cartamundi - Right: Faisán
Click to view full resolution
 
Left: Cartamundi - Right: Faisán

 

⬥  ⬥  ⬥

 

Design-wise, the sole significant difference between both decks lies in the Ace of Coins. In this edition, the pheasant (faisán) has flown away, replaced by a stone watchtower, while the "Marca Faisán" inscription gives way to an understated "As de Oros" (Ace of Coins).

We have at hand what could be considered the definitive version of this deck, giving a sensation similar to going from a cathode-ray tube screen to a modern HD display. And I don't mean this merely as an analogy; the contrast is so stark—given that these are old illustrations, reprinted countless times—that Cartamundi has clearly taken one of two paths. They have either sourced a well-preserved original for a high-resolution scan, or undertaken a meticulous digital restoration to emulate a first-generation copy. Whichever the case, significant effort has gone into preserving these culturally significant designs within the Mexican playing card industry.

 

⬥  ⬥  ⬥

 

Links to other decks featuring the same artwork.

 

    Coins

    As de Oros Dos de Oros Tres de Oros Cuatro de Oros Cinco de Oros Seis de Oros Siete de Oros Sota de Oros Caballo de Oros Rey de Oros

    Cups

    As de Copas Dos de Copas Tres de Copas Cuatro de Copas Cinco de Copas Seis de Copas Siete de Copas Sota de Copas Caballo de Copas Rey de Copas

    Swords

    As de Espadas Dos de Espadas Tres de Espadas Cuatro de Espadas Cinco de Espadas Seis de Espadas Siete de Espadas Sota de Espadas Caballo de Espadas Rey de Espadas

    Batons

    As de Bastos Dos de Bastos Tres de Bastos Cuatro de Bastos Cinco de Bastos Seis de Bastos Siete de Bastos Sota de Bastos Caballo de Bastos Rey de Bastos

    Card Back

    Dorso

    Palo

    ✖ Close
    ← Back to Gallery
    Zoom

     

     

    Comments

    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Cargando recomendaciones...